what a wierd country
Mar. 10th, 2005 12:11 pmno, for once i'm not talking about the uk. i'm talking about the us. there's an article on cnn today about infant euthanasia, and that dutch study. the commentary cnn chooses to put on this is ridiculous. focus on the family and such, bleating about the sanctity of life. two choice excerpts:
In the United States, some doctors and ethicists -- both supporters and opponents of euthanasia -- say newborn euthanasia has happened occasionally for decades, although it is much more common, and accepted, to withhold or stop intensive treatment and let the baby die. Experts said the new Dutch report will generate discussion but won't change American public opinion or practices.
and
Carrie Gordon Earll, bioethics policy analyst at Focus on the Family, said she thinks the U.S. medical community strongly opposes newborn euthanasia but that some cases have occurred.
"If they're done under cover and secret ... they should be prosecuted," she said. "This is not the Netherlands and we should not be on a slippery slope to baby infanticide."
i find it twisted that we live in a society that thinks it's cruel not to put a dog or a horse out of its misery but necessary for the dignity of human life to make an infant suffer. we'll withold treatment. how noble of us. we're not talking about killing kids with down's syndrome or autism, we're talking about not putting infants with illnesses or birth defects that are terminal through unnecessary pain. what sort of fucked up ideology demands that we extend their suffering?
(um, ms earll, what other kind of infanticide is there other than baby infanticide?)
In the United States, some doctors and ethicists -- both supporters and opponents of euthanasia -- say newborn euthanasia has happened occasionally for decades, although it is much more common, and accepted, to withhold or stop intensive treatment and let the baby die. Experts said the new Dutch report will generate discussion but won't change American public opinion or practices.
and
Carrie Gordon Earll, bioethics policy analyst at Focus on the Family, said she thinks the U.S. medical community strongly opposes newborn euthanasia but that some cases have occurred.
"If they're done under cover and secret ... they should be prosecuted," she said. "This is not the Netherlands and we should not be on a slippery slope to baby infanticide."
i find it twisted that we live in a society that thinks it's cruel not to put a dog or a horse out of its misery but necessary for the dignity of human life to make an infant suffer. we'll withold treatment. how noble of us. we're not talking about killing kids with down's syndrome or autism, we're talking about not putting infants with illnesses or birth defects that are terminal through unnecessary pain. what sort of fucked up ideology demands that we extend their suffering?
(um, ms earll, what other kind of infanticide is there other than baby infanticide?)